substack.com
PRELIMINARY2 analyses · As of 29 September 2026 · v2.3
How is substack.com rated?
KI-Mentor does not yet publish a rating for substack.com. The assessment so far rests on 2 analysed articles since 29 September 2026; a grade is published from 10 analyses onward — 8 still missing. Until then this page shows the detected patterns but no overall grade.
AI-generated analysis. Rating and reasoning are produced automatically and are not individually reviewed by an editor.
View the full methodologyComposite
Technique density
Trend (7d)
Trend (30d)
Not rated — too few analyses for a dependable rating — 2 of 10 analyses — a grade is published from 10 onward.
How has the rating of substack.com developed?
| As of | Score | Grade | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 October 2026 | 25.6 | — | 2 |
| 12 October 2026 | 25.6 | — | 2 |
What is the rating of substack.com based on?
39 detected findings across 2 analysed articles, grouped by the six analysis steps of the methodology.
Core Manipulation Techniques
10 · in 2 of 2 articles
Emotional appeals, authority arguments, urgency, loaded language, and false dilemmas
high 0 · medium 8 · low 2
Subtle Techniques
10 · in 2 of 2 articles
Euphemisms, repetition, presuppositions, and subliminal influence
high 0 · medium 8 · low 2
Statistics & Framing
8 · in 2 of 2 articles
Manipulation through numbers, selective presentation, and strategic framing
high 0 · medium 6 · low 2
Logical Fallacies
6 · in 2 of 2 articles
Ad Hominem, strawman arguments, slippery slope, and other logical fallacies
high 0 · medium 5 · low 1
Narratives & Stories
5 · in 1 of 2 articles
Personal anecdotes, emotional stories, and narrative persuasion
high 1 · medium 4 · low 0
Most frequent individual techniques
- Angst/Dringlichkeit2/2 articles
- Autoritätsargumente2/2 articles
- Bandwagon-Effekt2/2 articles
- Cherry Picking2/2 articles
- Dysphemismen2/2 articles
- Emotionale Appelle2/2 articles
- Euphemismen2/2 articles
- Falsche Äquivalenz2/2 articles
For copyright reasons no excerpts from the analysed articles are reproduced here — only the detected patterns and how often they occur. Each original article is linked.
Dispute this rating
If you represent substack.com or see an error in this rating: a short message is enough, no justification is required. Every report is reviewed within 7 days and the outcome is recorded.
Which substack.com articles were analysed?
| Score | Article | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 69 | Sep 29 | |
| 79 | Sep 29 |