whitehouse.gov
PRELIMINARY2 analyses · As of 2 August 2026 · v2.3
How is whitehouse.gov rated?
KI-Mentor does not yet publish a rating for whitehouse.gov. The assessment so far rests on 2 analysed articles since 26 July 2026; a grade is published from 10 analyses onward — 8 still missing. Until then this page shows the detected patterns but no overall grade.
AI-generated analysis. Rating and reasoning are produced automatically and are not individually reviewed by an editor.
View the full methodologyComposite
Technique density
Trend (7d)
Trend (30d)
Not rated — too few analyses for a dependable rating — 2 of 10 analyses — a grade is published from 10 onward.
How has the rating of whitehouse.gov developed?
| As of | Score | Grade | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 August 2026 | 24.0 | — | 1 |
| 9 August 2026 | 23.1 | — | 2 |
What is the rating of whitehouse.gov based on?
21 detected findings across 2 analysed articles, grouped by the six analysis steps of the methodology.
Core Manipulation Techniques
6 · in 2 of 2 articles
Emotional appeals, authority arguments, urgency, loaded language, and false dilemmas
high 3 · medium 2 · low 1
Subtle Techniques
4 · in 1 of 2 articles
Euphemisms, repetition, presuppositions, and subliminal influence
high 2 · medium 2 · low 0
Advanced Rhetoric
4 · in 1 of 2 articles
Complex metaphors, implicit biases, and dog whistles
high 1 · medium 2 · low 1
Statistics & Framing
3 · in 1 of 2 articles
Manipulation through numbers, selective presentation, and strategic framing
high 2 · medium 1 · low 0
Logical Fallacies
2 · in 1 of 2 articles
Ad Hominem, strawman arguments, slippery slope, and other logical fallacies
high 0 · medium 1 · low 1
Narratives & Stories
2 · in 1 of 2 articles
Personal anecdotes, emotional stories, and narrative persuasion
high 1 · medium 1 · low 0
Most frequent individual techniques
- Emotionale Appelle2/2 articles
- Angst/Dringlichkeit1/2 articles
- Autoritätsargumente1/2 articles
- Bandwagon-Effekt1/2 articles
- Cherry Picking1/2 articles
- Dog Whistles1/2 articles
- Euphemismen1/2 articles
- Falsche Kausalität1/2 articles
For copyright reasons no excerpts from the analysed articles are reproduced here — only the detected patterns and how often they occur. Each original article is linked.
Dispute this rating
If you represent whitehouse.gov or see an error in this rating: a short message is enough, no justification is required. Every report is reviewed within 7 days and the outcome is recorded.
Which whitehouse.gov articles were analysed?
| Score | Article | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 82 | Aug 2 | |
| 76 | Jul 26 |